Furlong Colony 1: Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ
F U R L O N G C O L O N Y 1
A sporadic update of the important effects unfolding in Furlong Colony 1.

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ

21 comments:

Josh said...

Please explain, how does the US government own 50% of its own debt?

It doesn't. Its inflation. If the US government is buying its own debt, the Federal Reserve would need to buy the debt through printing money, monetizing the debt, and inflating the money supply, stealing the value of the currency away from individual dollar holders. Taxation without representation.

Now, imagine to yourself what would happen if China, Japan, and Saudi Arabia stopped buying US debt and the Fed was the only entity left willing to by US Treasury Bonds. . .

Is the less likely scenario, imagine what would happen if the Chinese began selling their US debt. . .there would be run on the currency; it doesn't matter that they "only" hold 6% of the national debt.

Of course this is less likely because China wouldn't benefit from the sharp decrease in the value of the US dollar that would ensue...

They (along with other nations) are more likely to keep diversifying their reserves into gold and a basket of other currencies, avoiding more US debt like the plague it is, forcing the Fed to keep monetizing their own debt by printing money and buying treasury bonds. Now, you may say this won't lead to hyperinflation, but thats only if the US government stops printing at some point and raises interest rates, which will cause a sharp recession, which is why they won't do it, and the US is likely to face hyperinflation in 10 - 15 years.

That guy is a fucking idiot.

Douglas Porter said...

I wonder who the Chinese are going to sell their cheap products, made by wage slaves, to if they stop buying American debt and that leads to hyperinflation in 10-15 <--- LOL.

Douglas Porter said...

Of course, it sounds like you are still using Weimar Germany (nationalist imperialists war mongers) and Zimbabwe (corrupt dictatorship) with the United States. They are not the same even in the tiniest. The United States is not a dictatorship, not really nationalist, and not really imperialist. Some of it is, but that part is out of power. You see, Josh, what you are assuming, implicitly, that if inflation occurs at a greater rate in the future, that American leads will continue that road until America arrives at hyperinflation. I don't see that happening. The US is not like Weimar Germany or Zimbabwe.

Josh said...

I don't see a Paul Volcker as chairman of the Fed either...it has nothing to do with Zimbabwe and Germany, the US is going to get there in its own way.

Douglas Porter said...

HOW?

Josh said...

They (along with other nations) are more likely to keep diversifying their reserves into gold and a basket of other currencies, avoiding more US debt like the plague it is, forcing the Fed to keep monetizing their own debt by printing money and buying treasury bonds. Now, you may say this won't lead to hyperinflation, but thats only if the US government stops printing at some point and raises interest rates, which will cause a sharp recession, which is why they won't do it, and the US is likely to face hyperinflation in 10 - 15 years.

It will happen sooner if OPEC stops selling oil in dollars.

Douglas Porter said...

Meh, I think they will stop. Raising taxes for a few years is a better option. The American economy is still huge, and an increase in tax revenue could solve the problem easily. The problem with this solution is that people have been brainwashed by libertards and conservacrites for about 30 years.

Josh said...

If they raise taxes, there will be a genuine revolt.

Douglas Porter said...

"If they raise taxes, there will be a genuine revolt."

Then it will their fault, not the Fed's.

Josh said...

Whose fault?

Josh said...

Oh I get it. If there's ever a serious revolt, there won't be just one place to lay the blame.

Chris said...

The fault is far-and-wide. Deregulation is the fault of those who voted for the Republicons.

Josh said...

"Deregulation is the fault of those who voted for the Republicons."

Again, you can't identify any deregulation that took place under the Republicons; however they are at fault for a number of other issues.

Douglas Porter said...

The various updates to the CRA, under Republican controlled Congresses, which effectively eliminated the regulation.

Douglas Porter said...

The original CRA did not require banks to give people loans. It required them to stop red-lining entire neighborhoods.

Josh said...

Can you identify a specific legislative update?

Douglas Porter said...

"Can you identify a specific legislative update?"

All of the updates to the CRA.

Josh said...

"All of the updates to the CRA."

All updates to the CRA did not deregulate the mortgage markets. I've been trying to find a specific update that did so, however I cannot find one. If you're going to make the point, you should be able to make a specific reference.

Douglas Porter said...

http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/nov1999/bank-n01.shtml

Douglas Porter said...

http://www.24thstate.com/2008/11/did-the-cra-cau.html


Who controlled Congress during the Clinton years? OH FUCKING RIGHT, The Republicons and their running dog, Ron Paul.

Douglas Porter said...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4485795

 
F U R L O N G C O L O N Y 1
A sporadic update of the important events unfolding in Furlong Colony 1.