http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-BarackObamaUK/idUSTRE50M3PQ20090123?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=10112
Oh, wait! Whose job is it to block a woman's right to choose? No, wait, is that Ron Paul championing the right of the state to limit one's right to choose? Yes, indeed!
That's right, Obama. A woman has the right to choose.
Saturday, January 24, 2009
Freedom Goes Global, Again
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Right, unfortunately for your logic, the woman's life isn't the only one involved.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the statement Ron Paul made in the video you presented.
A "right" that violates another invidivual's "right" is not a "right".
Sorry, the fetus is not an individual by definition. Individuals are seperate beings not attached to other being. It is not a person. You apparently don't understand the definition of "individual".
Nor is the fetus self-conscious. Nor can it feel pain. In fact, the only part of the mother that is self-conscious and can feel pain is the mother.
Yes, I'm pretty sure the fetus, which is connected to the mother and hence not an individual, does think to itself, "I want to live!" The backwards logic of Anti-Choice is appalling!
Your misunderstanding of life is rather appalling.
Not as appalling as your understanding of what constitutes individuality.
Post a Comment